Re: Highest Level?
It depends on what side you are on.

Home | Forums | SWTOR | SWKotOR | SWKotOR2 | Downloads | Fan Fic/Art | Shop | Ask HK-47 | Reviews | News | Links
Old-Republic.com - SWKotOR & SWTOR Forums
Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic & The Old Republic Forums
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
It depends on what side you are on.
not really...honorable wins honorable losses.
So with your logic then that means that the south in the civil war faught with honor even tho they were fighting to keep slaves and slipt this country into.
If you cheat to win then it is still a win.
no it isn't. it just proves you have no balls, no honor, and no integrity to get a real win.
-50
I agree with Prince on this 100%. My respect for you as a gamer, Jest, just went out the window. Cheating is dishonorable and it takes the fun out of it. Sure you might beat the game but you're a f**king p***y compared to the hard ass who actually f**king beat the damn thing without cutting corners.
How can you f**king cheat?! I... I'm really not fond of you right now, Jest. I mean... I really can't stand cheaters. They p**s me off.
So with your logic then that means that the south in the civil war faught with honor even tho they were fighting to keep slaves and slipt this country into.
Umm... how the hell did you get that from what Prince was saying?
I don't cheat when I am playing games because when I beat a game I know that I did it all myself and had no help from cheats. But in war they cheat but call it getting the edge on your enemy so in that point cheating is good in real life but when it comes to games cheating makes a game not worth playing to me. I know when I play Gears online I hate the people who glitch off the map and end up winning because they can kill you but you can't find them.
So with your logic then that means that the south in the civil war faught with honor even tho they were fighting to keep slaves and slipt this country into.
they fought honorably, absolutely. the causes they fought for, however were not honorable. but as far as the battlefield goes, objectively, they fought with the most honor and integrity. Robert E. Lee was a brilliant military tactician, matched only by his counterpart: Ulysses S. Grant. get the difference?
I don't cheat when I am playing games because when I beat a game I know that I did it all myself and had no help from cheats. But in war they cheat but call it getting the edge on your enemy so in that point cheating is good in real life but when it comes to games cheating makes a game not worth playing to me. I know when I play Gears online I hate the people who glitch off the map and end up winning because they can kill you but you can't find them.
Hmmm...
they fought honorably, absolutely. the causes they fought for, however were not honorable. but as far as the battlefield goes, objectively, they fought with the most honor and integrity. Robert E. Lee was a brilliant military tactician, matched only by his counterpart: Ulysses S. Grant. get the difference?
Everyone's entitled to their opinion.
I agree with you Prince and did you know that the soldiers of the south did not own slaves and most of them were poor themselfs but the men who did own slaves were the leaders in the south and wanted to keep their slaves. The soldiers of the south faught not to keep slaves but to fight because it was the right thing to do to fight for your side.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion.
my opinion is the truth. unless you're demoting the truth to an opinion because you think blacks are nothing but slaves....
....didn't think so. so it is the truth.
I agree with you Prince and did you know that the soldiers of the south did not own slaves and most of them were poor themselfs but the men who did own slaves were the leaders in the south and wanted to keep their slaves. The soldiers of the south faught not to keep slaves but to fight because it was the right thing to do to fight for your side.
don't be stupid, kyle. the reason why they didn't own slaves is for what you just said: they were poor. they couldnt afford to buy one! they thought of blacks just the same: a bunch of ignorant, cotton pickin, swamp runnin 'coons.
I got that straight from history and you just put your people down with a statement like that and sounded more like a slave owner then a black man.
Also people blame white people for making with slaves but it was their own people and leaders in their tribes in Africa that sold their own people as slaves for guns. So if you think, You can not blame white people for having slave 100% because by the way I look at it is more 50/50.
I got that straight from history and you just put your people down with a statement like that and sounded more like a slave owner then a black man.
that was the point. its called sarcasm.
Also people blame white people for making with slaves but it was their own people and leaders in their tribes in Africa that sold their own people as slaves for guns. So if you think, You can not blame white people for having slave 100% because by the way I look at it is more 50/50.
same here. i never said i blame anglo's 100%
my opinion is the truth. unless you're demoting the truth to an opinion because you think blacks are nothing but slaves....
....didn't think so. so it is the truth.
Not exactly what I meant but let's just stick with that.
same here. i never said i blame anglo's 100%
Thank God there are still decent people with sense! I hate hearing people arguing over this s**t. I want to slap them all.
Prince and I have debates but that is about as far as it gose these days.
thats because we're both patriots. yes, I'm a Christian calling a non-Christian a patriot. this thing happens, Kyle, when you meet true followers of Christ.
(and that starts another discussion...im on a role)
Anyboby can be a patriot and their religion has nothing to do with it.
true....
But then you have those people who act like Patriots but will sell their mother for the right price.
true again. hypocrites.